Chippewa vs Icelander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Icelanders

Fair
Good
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Icelander Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,673,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.299% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 298.6 Icelanders.
Chippewa Integration in Icelander Communities

Chippewa vs Icelander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,987, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $102,261, a difference of 21.8%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,797, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,247, a difference of 9.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,109, a difference of 11.7%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Income
Income MetricChippewaIcelander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Excellent
$44,987
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Good
$104,282
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Good
$85,797
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Good
$46,916
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Good
$55,415
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Fair
$39,109
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$51,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Good
$95,560
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Good
$102,261
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Average
$61,270
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.5%

Chippewa vs Icelander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.1%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.4%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaIcelander
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.5%

Chippewa vs Icelander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 94.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaIcelander
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chippewa vs Icelander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaIcelander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Average
82.8%

Chippewa vs Icelander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.48%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaIcelander
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Excellent
30.3%

Chippewa vs Icelander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaIcelander
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Chippewa vs Icelander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaIcelander
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
48.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chippewa vs Icelander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%).
Chippewa vs Icelander Disability
Disability MetricChippewaIcelander
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%