Chippewa vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,391,052 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 21.9 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,289, a difference of 18.1%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $42,950, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $97,284, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,609, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,837, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 72.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.8%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 46.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.8%).