Chippewa vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,124,093 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $52,217, a difference of 42.5%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $94,846, a difference of 34.5%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $115,847, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,984, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $42,837, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.0%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 73.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%).