Chippewa vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,547,882 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $52,044, a difference of 42.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $96,378, a difference of 36.6%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $63,326, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,891, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $64,512, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 48.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 100.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 28.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.0%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 57.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 59.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 74.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 69.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 74.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 51.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%).