Chippewa vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,706,545 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $33,931, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,422, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $33,236, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $84,910, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $78,809, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 18.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households (62.1% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.9%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 122.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.75%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.5%).