Chippewa vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,053,926 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 20.5 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,818, a difference of 21.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $99,943, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $94,423, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.59%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,656, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,328, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 34.1%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 30.4%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.0%), currently married (43.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (62.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.3%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%).