Chippewa vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,949,722 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 8.5 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $41,261, a difference of 17.9%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $42,406, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,163, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $90,266, a difference of 7.5%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $93,919, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.4%), single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 59.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.44%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 41.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.60%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 176.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 93.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 22.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 49.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 71.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 56.0%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 81.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 58.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%).