Chippewa vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,075,182 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $50,950, a difference of 39.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $95,032, a difference of 34.7%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $62,057, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,022, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $64,828, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 54.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 48.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 85.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 53.0%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 49.9%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 62.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 46.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.5%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.7%).