Chippewa vs Immigrants from Syria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,289,013 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.787. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Syria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 25.3 Immigrants from Syria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,792, a difference of 25.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $104,858, a difference of 24.9%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,218, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,494, a difference of 9.5%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,499, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 41.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 45.2%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), family households (62.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 41.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.53%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.1%).