Chippewa vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,739,764 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.0%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $33,378, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,721, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $83,953, a difference of 0.010%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,611, a difference of 0.52%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $86,380, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.3%).