Chippewa vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,799,516 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.744. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 16.3 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $50,303, a difference of 37.3%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $62,658, a difference of 35.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $107,393, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $62,162, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,743, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 50.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 102.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 31.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 66.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.87%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 77.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 59.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 38.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 65.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 59.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 83.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 54.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.8%).