Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Grenada
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Grenada
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,974,432 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Immigrants from Grenada.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 54.4%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $41,932, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,538, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $85,552, a difference of 1.9%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $89,249, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $50,747, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $41,123 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $89,249 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $76,517 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Fair $45,596 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $50,279 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $41,932 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $54,538 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $88,311 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $85,552 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $50,747 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 36.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 20.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 75.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 72.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.49%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 25.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 67.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.0% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.90%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 37.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 39.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 296.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 176.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 136.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 99.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 136.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 37.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 62.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 28.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 2.7% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 68.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 91.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 90.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 88.4% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 85.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 81.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 59.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 35.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 99.1%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 82.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Grenada |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 0.94% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Good 11.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Fair 23.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |