Chippewa vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,654,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of French within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $55,350, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,685, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $99,824, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,230, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,457, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,656, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.0%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.9%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.53%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.5%).