Chippewa vs Polish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,172,707 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Poles within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Poles.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $105,952, a difference of 26.2%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,123, a difference of 25.9%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,472, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,407, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,598, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 51.1%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 50.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 69.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.8%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.9%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Polish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.4%).