Chippewa vs Turkish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Turkish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Turks
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Turkish Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,338,240 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 36.7 Turks.
Chippewa vs Turkish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $52,391, a difference of 43.0%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $99,389, a difference of 40.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $117,814, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,266, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $68,037, a difference of 26.4%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $52,391 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $121,202 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $99,389 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $53,919 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $64,253 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $44,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $54,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $110,318 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $117,814 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $68,037 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chippewa vs Turkish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 60.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.9%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Chippewa vs Turkish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 89.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chippewa vs Turkish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 35.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Chippewa vs Turkish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.4%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 55.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.1%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Chippewa vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 16.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chippewa vs Turkish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 78.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 88.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 70.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Chippewa vs Turkish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 55.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.9%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Turkish |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |