Chippewa vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,093,417 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 33.7 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $51,361, a difference of 40.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $96,836, a difference of 37.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $63,346, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 14.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,028, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $66,087, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 66.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 62.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.9%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 76.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.9%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 53.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 61.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 60.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 56.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%).