Chippewa vs Bermudan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Bermudan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Bermudans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bermudan Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,000,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 104.5 Bermudans.
Chippewa vs Bermudan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $42,911, a difference of 17.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,406, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $45,593, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $47,359, a difference of 0.73%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $58,171, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.1%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Fair $42,911 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $97,577 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $80,406 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Fair $45,593 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Poor $52,465 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Fair $39,418 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $47,359 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $88,231 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $94,197 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $58,171 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.1% |
Chippewa vs Bermudan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 32.8%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 9.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Chippewa vs Bermudan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 53.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Chippewa vs Bermudan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chippewa vs Bermudan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.10%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.57%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 42.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 35.5% |
Chippewa vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 35.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 87.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 50.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Chippewa vs Bermudan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 35.0%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.39%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Good 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Average 91.2% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Average 85.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Average 65.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Average 59.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Average 46.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chippewa vs Bermudan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.23%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Bermudan |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |