Chippewa vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,202,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 30.0 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $49,152, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,655, a difference of 7.7%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $34,942, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,580, a difference of 0.46%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $40,619, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 37.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 90.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 37.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 53.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 57.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.3%).