Chippewa vs Liberian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Liberians

Fair
Poor
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Liberian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,048,976 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Liberians.
Chippewa Integration in Liberian Communities

Chippewa vs Liberian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,215, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $43,536, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,356, a difference of 0.95%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $82,005, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $48,917, a difference of 4.0%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Income
Income MetricChippewaLiberian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$38,780
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$91,722
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$75,667
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$43,536
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$49,318
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$48,917
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$82,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$88,929
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$54,356
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
21.4%

Chippewa vs Liberian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.84%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaLiberian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
20.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.8%

Chippewa vs Liberian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 64.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaLiberian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.0%

Chippewa vs Liberian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaLiberian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
67.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Excellent
83.0%

Chippewa vs Liberian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.4%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaLiberian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
40.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
37.4%

Chippewa vs Liberian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.2%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 26.6%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaLiberian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.3%

Chippewa vs Liberian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.9%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaLiberian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Poor
88.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
56.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
43.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs Liberian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.7%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.81%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Chippewa vs Liberian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaLiberian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%