Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Ecuador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Ecuador
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,029,420 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 79.9 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,722, a difference of 14.3%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,341, a difference of 13.9%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $41,195, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,030, a difference of 0.34%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $92,837, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $50,474, a difference of 8.9%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $41,195 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $92,837 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $80,341 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $44,462 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $50,474 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Poor $38,644 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,722 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $89,673 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $91,462 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $54,030 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 35.2%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 69.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 41.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 42.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 33.7% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 152.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 78.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 60.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 23.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 40.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 4.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 93.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 91.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 90.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 84.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 81.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 58.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 34.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.8%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 61.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |