Chippewa vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,136,702 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $34,584, a difference of 35.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $40,550, a difference of 32.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $60,305, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $32,500, a difference of 7.7%), median earnings ($40,287 compared to $36,876, a difference of 9.2%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $41,715, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 56.1%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 53.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.8%), single female poverty (26.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 41.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.7%).