Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Tlingit-Haida

Fair
Average
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tlingit-Haida Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,621,163 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Tlingit-Haida.
Chippewa Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,968, a difference of 19.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,914, a difference of 18.9%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,516, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.3%), median earnings ($40,287 compared to $45,468, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,513, a difference of 12.9%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Income
Income MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Average
$43,516
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Fair
$101,092
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Fair
$83,968
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Fair
$45,468
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Poor
$52,409
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Average
$39,513
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$55,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Fair
$92,987
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Poor
$97,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Excellent
$62,922
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
24.0%

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 46.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 12.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 22.2%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Average
11.6%

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 105.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
23.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
20.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.9%

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.8%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (62.1% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.4%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
61.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Fair
32.2%

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.1%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.9%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.5%), male disability (14.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
Disability MetricChippewaTlingit-Haida
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
4.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%