Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Immigrants from Romania

Fair
Exceptional
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Romania Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,096,764 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Immigrants from Romania.
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $49,463, a difference of 35.0%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $94,222, a difference of 33.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $110,633, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,522, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $64,462, a difference of 19.7%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Income
Income MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$113,434
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$94,222
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$51,337
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$61,040
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$42,718
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$55,522
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$104,713
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$110,633
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$64,462
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.0%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 54.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 48.9%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.8%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 87.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 52.9%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
48.3%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
27.9%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.5%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.2%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Poor
6.0%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 54.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
42.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Disability
Disability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Romania
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%