Chippewa vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,846,910 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 92.2 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $49,997, a difference of 6.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,899, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $83,937, a difference of 0.010%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,651, a difference of 0.060%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $34,960, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 105.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 58.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 29.2%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 118.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.6%).