Chippewa vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,304,449 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $78,327, a difference of 11.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $90,909, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $85,553, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,631 compared to $37,857, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $36,841, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.6%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 74.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 25.4%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.1%), currently married (43.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.7% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 0.18%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.7%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.6%).