Chippewa vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,408,680 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.001% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 3,000.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $30,644, a difference of 19.5%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $73,365, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.92%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $82,821, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $38,285, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 109.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 82.9%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 88.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 70.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 28.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.8%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 77.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 38.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.2%).