Chippewa vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,073,178 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 10.9 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,275, a difference of 13.3%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $79,737, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $92,554, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,474, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $36,904, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,215, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 43.2%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 84.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (43.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 79.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.6%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%).