Chippewa vs Inupiat Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,456,385 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Inupiat.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 20.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,935, a difference of 19.0%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,080, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,999, a difference of 1.0%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $47,281, a difference of 2.0%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $91,730, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 36.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.60%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 94.5%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 84.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 57.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (43.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 216.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 34.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 25.1%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.11%), 8th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 97.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.7%).