Chippewa vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Tongans

Fair
Good
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,957,691 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Tongans.
Chippewa Integration in Tongan Communities

Chippewa vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,076, a difference of 32.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $108,643, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $68,235, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,288, a difference of 9.4%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $45,665, a difference of 13.4%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Income
Income MetricChippewaTongan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.5%

Chippewa vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 65.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.2%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaTongan
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Chippewa vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 92.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 65.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.9%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaTongan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chippewa vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Excellent
83.1%

Chippewa vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 50.2%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.1%), currently married (43.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and family households (62.1% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaTongan
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
28.4%

Chippewa vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 23.3%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaTongan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chippewa vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaTongan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Chippewa vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.8%).
Chippewa vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricChippewaTongan
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%