Chippewa vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,310,462 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,402, a difference of 4.4%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $73,509, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $41,822, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,029, a difference of 0.34%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $81,531, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 53.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.91%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.67%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.98%).