Chippewa vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Potawatomi

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,782,549 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 14.3 Potawatomi.
Chippewa Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.0%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,768, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $38,046, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,212, a difference of 0.68%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $34,739, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $84,613, a difference of 0.80%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricChippewaPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.7%

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.8%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.44%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaPotawatomi
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
12.5%

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaPotawatomi
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
80.0%

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaPotawatomi
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
36.2%

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Chippewa vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Chippewa vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricChippewaPotawatomi
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%