Chippewa vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,246,825 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 43.6 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $49,989, a difference of 6.3%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $34,559, a difference of 6.0%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $74,399, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,897, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,147, a difference of 0.48%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $80,427, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.32%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 17.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), single father households (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 101.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.6%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.2%).