Chippewa vs Moroccan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Moroccans

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Moroccan Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,725,046 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 39.1 Moroccans.
Chippewa Integration in Moroccan Communities

Chippewa vs Moroccan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,854, a difference of 25.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $86,468, a difference of 22.6%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $56,499, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,683, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,256, a difference of 13.3%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Income
Income MetricChippewaMoroccan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$45,854
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Good
$104,488
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Good
$86,468
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$48,838
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Excellent
$56,499
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$41,872
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$53,256
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Good
$96,117
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Average
$100,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Fair
$59,683
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
24.0%

Chippewa vs Moroccan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaMoroccan
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.8%

Chippewa vs Moroccan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaMoroccan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Chippewa vs Moroccan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaMoroccan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Poor
35.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Poor
82.5%

Chippewa vs Moroccan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.75%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaMoroccan
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Average
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Average
31.8%

Chippewa vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 55.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 54.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 35.5%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaMoroccan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
14.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
48.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
15.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
4.9%

Chippewa vs Moroccan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.43%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaMoroccan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
40.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Chippewa vs Moroccan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.4%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Chippewa vs Moroccan Disability
Disability MetricChippewaMoroccan
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%