Chippewa vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,235,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 23.9 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $55,082, a difference of 50.4%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $66,125, a difference of 42.6%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $123,831, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,830, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $44,587, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.4%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 92.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.7%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 52.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.2%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 100.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 89.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%).