Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Sri Lankans

Fair
Good
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sri Lankan Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,497,394 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 12.1 Sri Lankans.
Chippewa Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,093, a difference of 32.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $108,270, a difference of 29.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $101,960, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,496, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,470, a difference of 18.0%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Income
Income MetricChippewaSri Lankan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Average
$44,014
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$108,234
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$93,093
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$48,040
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Excellent
$56,136
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Excellent
$40,496
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$55,470
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$101,960
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$108,270
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$64,201
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Average
25.8%

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 47.6%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaSri Lankan
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.6%

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 100.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaSri Lankan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaSri Lankan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 47.3%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.35, a difference of 4.7%), family households (62.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 9.4%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaSri Lankan
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
28.9%

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.5%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaSri Lankan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.4%

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 86.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaSri Lankan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
90.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Average
38.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 46.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%).
Chippewa vs Sri Lankan Disability
Disability MetricChippewaSri Lankan
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%