Chippewa vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,217,805 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.784. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,933, a difference of 33.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $103,954, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $106,952, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.5%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $42,694, a difference of 16.6%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $54,958, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 54.4%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 88.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 52.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 29.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 46.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.45, a difference of 7.9%), and family households (62.1% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 114.5%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 105.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.1%).