Chippewa vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,127,362 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 27.9 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 24.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,825, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $50,071, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $83,311, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $81,351, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $85,411, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.24%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 34.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.3%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 135.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 16.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 37.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 56.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 73.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 51.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.0%).