Chippewa vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,600,495 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.2%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,895, a difference of 16.8%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $80,373, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $55,598, a difference of 3.3%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $93,988, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $91,347, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 66.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 45.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.8%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 160.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 84.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 18.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.2%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 60.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%).