Chippewa vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,625,061 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 36.7 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $33,775, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $45,450, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,287 compared to $40,270, a difference of 0.040%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $69,947, a difference of 0.85%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,060, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.7%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.22%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 15.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.43%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.8%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.2%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.0%).