Chinese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,422,749 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.140% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 140.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $67,353, a difference of 18.4%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $54,264, a difference of 17.7%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $56,638, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $57,931, a difference of 0.40%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $122,178, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 22.6%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 84.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.9%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.2%), male disability (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.2%).