Chinese vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,852,118 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 9.0 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $55,582, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $65,406, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $54,478, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $118,318, a difference of 1.9%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $100,699, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $122,765, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 28.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 9.0%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.0%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.7%).