Panamanian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,480,334 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to a decrease of 32.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $119,756, a difference of 32.8%), per capita income ($42,035 compared to $54,264, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($97,683 compared to $125,540, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $69,174, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 34.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.4%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 62.5%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.2%).