Chinese vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,716,028 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,586, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,073, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $102,969, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,527, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,848, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,433, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 64.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.020%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.0%).