Chinese vs Austrian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Austrian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Austrians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,605
SOCIAL INDEX
83.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
60th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Austrian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,927,689 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Austrians.
Chinese vs Austrian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,470, a difference of 20.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,898, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,923, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,501, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $101,842, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $48,116 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $111,306 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $91,339 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $49,501 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $59,359 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $40,923 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Fair $51,898 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $101,842 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $108,692 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $64,470 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.4% |
Chinese vs Austrian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Good 28.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Chinese vs Austrian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 57.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chinese vs Austrian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.49%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 39.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Excellent 83.0% |
Chinese vs Austrian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Good 31.0% |
Chinese vs Austrian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 58.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chinese vs Austrian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 61.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 40.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chinese vs Austrian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.53%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Austrian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 11.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |