Chinese vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,994,499 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.930. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 70.2 Potawatomi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,212, a difference of 42.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $84,613, a difference of 37.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $72,576, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.0%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $48,768, a difference of 16.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,288, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 63.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 60.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.7%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.6%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.3%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.64%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.9%).