Chinese vs Slavic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Slavic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Slavs
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slavic Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,731,193 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 48.9 Slavs.
Chinese vs Slavic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,709, a difference of 25.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,563, a difference of 15.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,398, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,390, a difference of 0.85%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,049, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,470, a difference of 2.9%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Excellent $45,049 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Good $105,144 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Good $86,398 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Excellent $47,470 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Excellent $56,390 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Average $39,613 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $50,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Good $96,377 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Good $102,629 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Good $61,709 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chinese vs Slavic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 32.0%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Chinese vs Slavic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chinese vs Slavic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Good 82.9% |
Chinese vs Slavic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Average 31.6% |
Chinese vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chinese vs Slavic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Good 1.9% |
Chinese vs Slavic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.92%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Slavic |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |