Chinese vs Bahamian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Bahamian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Bahamians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bahamian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,797,548 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 121.2 Bahamians.
Chinese vs Bahamian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,000, a difference of 51.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $81,369, a difference of 42.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $69,726, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,125, a difference of 18.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $39,735, a difference of 22.9%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $36,427, a difference of 26.6%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $36,427 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $82,631 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $69,726 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $39,735 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $44,756 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $35,125 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $45,743 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $75,395 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $81,369 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $51,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Chinese vs Bahamian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 81.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 81.6%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.6%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Chinese vs Bahamian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.8%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chinese vs Bahamian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chinese vs Bahamian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 40.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 41.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 40.8% |
Chinese vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 74.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Chinese vs Bahamian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.7%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.81%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Poor 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chinese vs Bahamian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.76%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Bahamian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 24.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |