Chinese vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Bahamians

Exceptional
Tragic
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,797,548 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 121.2 Bahamians.
Chinese Integration in Bahamian Communities

Chinese vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,000, a difference of 51.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $81,369, a difference of 42.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $69,726, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,125, a difference of 18.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $39,735, a difference of 22.9%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $36,427, a difference of 26.6%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricChineseBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Exceptional
20.2%

Chinese vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 81.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 81.6%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.6%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.5%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseBahamian
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
17.0%

Chinese vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.8%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.0%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseBahamian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%

Chinese vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Tragic
82.2%

Chinese vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseBahamian
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Tragic
40.8%

Chinese vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 74.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.1%

Chinese vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.7%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.81%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Chinese vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chinese vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricChineseBahamian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%