Chinese vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,495,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $57,580, a difference of 34.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $96,537, a difference of 20.3%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $97,222, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,833, a difference of 6.8%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,090, a difference of 8.3%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $51,594, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 54.4%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 51.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.2%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.28%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 137.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.6%).