Chinese vs Peruvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Peruvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Peruvians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,786
SOCIAL INDEX
55.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
168th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Peruvian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,551,433 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 61.8 Peruvians.
Chinese vs Peruvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,766, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $105,070, a difference of 10.5%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $105,444, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,659, a difference of 2.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,628, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Good $44,479 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Excellent $105,444 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $90,261 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Excellent $47,628 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Good $55,659 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Good $40,234 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $56,052 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $98,886 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $105,070 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Excellent $62,766 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Good 25.6% |
Chinese vs Peruvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Average 11.7% |
Chinese vs Peruvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Fair 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Chinese vs Peruvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chinese vs Peruvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.3%), family households (68.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Average 31.5% |
Chinese vs Peruvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.0%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Fair 55.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Average 19.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Good 6.5% |
Chinese vs Peruvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.2%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 93.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Poor 64.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Fair 58.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 38.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Chinese vs Peruvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.8%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Peruvian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |