Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bahamas

Immigrants from China

Tragic
Good
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,501,709 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 24.9 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $119,756, a difference of 55.7%), median male earnings ($45,176 compared to $67,353, a difference of 49.1%), and median family income ($84,732 compared to $125,540, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,793 compared to $57,931, a difference of 26.5%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $69,174, a difference of 30.1%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,193
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,732
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,349
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,861
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,176
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,027
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,793
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,910
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,177
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,174
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Poor
26.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 66.7%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 64.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.7%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 62.5%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 57.8%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 53.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 104.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 77.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.1%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BahamasImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%